"Say We believe in God and what is revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and I`saac and Jacob and the Tribes, and what was entrusted to Moses and Jesus and the prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them and to Him we have surrendered."
(Quran 3: 84)
It is unfortunate that the Common Law system used in many Muslim countries has
made such a great impact on the minds of even Muslim lawyers and Scholars that,
they too criticise Shariah as a 'harsh and brutal' legal system. It will take a
long time to remove this impression from the minds of Western educated Muslim
scholars. The non Muslims, on their part, have not been given an opportunity to
understand the Islamic, Legal System. The result is the vicious campaign against
Shariah. The most forceful part of the criticism is the West's denunciation of
the harshness of the Hadd punishments provided by the Shariah. Obviously this
stems from their self-styled conception of human dignity which evokes
unnecessary sympathy for criminals too. For a moment, the Western sociologist
forgets the heinous deeds of the criminals, their impact on the society and
prescribes lighter punishments with all politeness. Contrary to it, Islam
imposes a rigid code of punishment for the microscopic minority of criminals and
ensures an atmosphere of peace and security for the rest of the society. If this
basic difference is kept in mind while striking a comparison between the two,
the whole matter can be understood easily.
Crimes and punishments have their own long history behind them. From inhuman
punishments of the monarchical past to the soft policy of the present-day
democratic age, the punishments have been showing an upward trend. This is how
the so-called humanising process has yielded results. The spurt in crimes
following the economic boom in the West has brought its own strange
interpretation from the Western sociologists, who, till only a few days back
were ascribing unsatisfactory economic and social conditions to the increasing
criminal mentality. The very sociologist now harps a different tune. He
unabashedly calls the criminal mentality an essential element of human nature.
This clear succumbing to the situation has come as a result of the West's
failure to dam the advancing wave of crimes. More sorrowfully the West has
committed the folly of taking a few retrograde steps, so to say, to improve the
situation merely on the paper. This has been done in order to cut down the
burden on national exchequer; which has been claiming an increasingly bigger
slice of the financial cake for the maintenance of Police, Jails, and Courts.
This foolish tampering with the situation has been affected mindless of the
future repercussions by de-listing a few crimes.
For example, Norway and Sweden have stolen the march by legalising homosexuality
and lesbianism. West Germany and almost all the Scandinavian countries have
respectively lifted the ban on import and circulation of pornographic
literature. England and Italy have allowed abortions (either for a mother or
spinster). The fresh blow to the existing ethical values has come from Spain
where, according to an approved bill of cabinet, adultery will no longer be a
crime. In sharp contrast to this situation, the Islamic world presents a
peaceful and much cleaner society. When we cast a glance at the Muslim countries
where Shariah is applied, crime rate has become negligible to the extent that
Saudi Arabia reported just one murder in one year. This can wholly be attributed
to the deterrent punishments of Islam. Turning a blind eye to these facts, the
West is solely guided in its criticism by the superficial understanding of
Islamic code.
Primarily, the emphasis of Islamic code is on preventing the crimes by
prescribing harsh punishments while contemporary code deals with a criminal
individually. The treatment thus meted out does not consider the impact of the
crime and its aftermath but simply suggests a punishment to be awarded to
criminal.
The detailed study of the Shariah penal system reveals a few more salient
features of it which are unique in their character and kind. One can find
blessings of the Shariah while glancing through the pages of history. A few
basic qualities of Islamic system shows the marked difference from the European
legal system.
In order to avoid any discrimination between rich and poor, Shariah enjoins
similar treatment to all in the event, of crimes of social and moral nature.
Islam does not prescribe monetary fines or penalties. Had this been the case,
the wealthy people would have easily got rid of punishments after paying the
required sum as fine. It could have promoted criminal mentality among wealthy
sections of the society. This equality before the law in Islam has deterred even
the rich people to indulge in crimes. Western society today suffers from the
same deficiency. The provisions of their legal system have given the rich
society a license for crimes.
Another disapproved form of punishment is imprisonment. It isolates the offender
from the society and does not arouse in him a feeling of shame or repentance.
Contrary to this, the modern prisons have served as a rendezvous for all sorts
of criminals. After their release an offender is found to be far more skilled in
his art.
Punishments like amputation of hand, whipping, stoning to death and beheading
have the dual impact of preventing the individual from committing the same crime
in future and serving a stern warning to others. Treatment meted out to an
ex-convict plays the greatest role in rehabilitating him. West's scornful
attitude towards an ex-convict has resisted his return towards a dignified life.
One's conviction in life should not become a stigma to his name. He should be
allowed to lead a normal life. Constitutions of the modern democracies contain
clauses which disqualify an ex-convict from contesting for seats in legislature,
holding key positions in administration, and public offices.
Islamic Penal Code sternly prohibits this dual disability for an ex-convict.
Once the official punishment ends, the convict is a dignified citizen of the
state enjoying civil rights in its totality. He need not carry any appendage of
conviction with his name. No hurdles would be placed in his economic or social
progress on the basis of his conviction. A return to the normal life is thus
facilitated by the whole society and state under Shariah. The Prophet strictly
admonished his friends from giving any bad names to Ma'izz Bin Aslami and
Ghamiddiya, two sahabi who, out of fear of punishments in the life hereafter,
self-confessed the sin of adultery and wore stoned to death. The Prophet called
their confession as the most courageous and noblest act. This is how Islam
refines the society. If you assure the criminals of a respectful place in
society, there is no reason for them to hesitate from turning a new leaf in
their lives. In most cases, it is fear of contemptuous treatment by society that
deters the convict from becoming a normal citizen. Shariah adopts a realistic
and practical attitude towards life. In life, one cannot depend too much on the
moral and spiritual qualities of good individuals. If all men were equally
spiritual, and if all could fear Allah, then there would be no need of law. But
most men are not afraid of Allah so much as they are afraid of their society,
public opinion and the punishment for evil-doing which they receive from the
court of law. Therefore, the fear of Allah is and will remain confined to a few
persons. Most men will continue to avoid committing any crime not from the fear
of Allah and the Day of Judgment but from the fear of men and the fear of
punishment by the authority. Since the Shariah seeks to build society and a
political community, it has to take account of all kinds of men, good or bad,
virtuous or vicious.
For men fearing Allah, it inculcates love and charity and holds out the promise
of reward in the hereafter, but for the greater number of people in whom the
fear of Allah is not very strong, it prescribes laws. and lays down punishments.
Thus it makes use of both moral and legal sanctions because it realises that
both morality and law are necessary for political and social life.
It is merely an allegation that harsh Islamic laws would convert the society
into a den of crippled and indolent persons. It is mainly due to the partial
understanding of the Islamic System. Islam solves the social and economic
problems of a man on a priority basis so that one should not be stimulated to
commit crimes due to social and economic injustices. Secondly, the Islamic
punitive measures are implemented through a gradual process. With the advent of
the Prophet and his party at Medina, the Islamic Penal Code was not suddenly
clamped over the city. Had it been the 'case the results would have been the
same what critics allege.
The Prophet enforced the Islamic order in 10 years of time after due training
and education of masses. The Qur’an, itself imposed total prohibition in three
phases. Crime detection has also its own effect on criminal psychology. Islam
has a distinctive advance here too over its Western counterparts, Mere suspicion
is no ground for punishing a criminal until crime is reported through a reliable
source by the prescribed number of
witnesses. In the event of a person being apprehended on inadequate evidence
and, later on, the charges having been proved false the integrity of that
individual would be impaired. The present codes do not guarantee such
safeguards. An individual may be acquitted. after a lengthy process of
humiliations. This generates an atmosphere of suspicion where every individual
lives as a suspect. Similarly, Islam prohibits ‘crime digging’.
These are a few virtues of Islamic Penal Code. In the light of these, the
Prophet said that a time would come when one will traverse the distance between
Yemen and Hadrmaut, without any danger to his life and property.
This came out true in the later years when Islam conquered the whole area. Its
impact may still be seen in countries where Islamic law is even partially in
force. In the so called highly advanced countries like the United States of
America, it is dangerous even to move out of one's residence after it is dark.
The high rate of crimes in Western countries can be imagined from the following
figures:
Instance
of Murder
Country
Cases
per 100,000 population
USA
9.6
West Germany
4.8
Britain
2.3
Japan
1.9
Instance
of Robbery
Country
Cases
per 100,000 population
USA
218.2
West Germany
33.4
Britain
23.0
Japan
2.1
Instance
of Rape
Country
Cases
per 100,000 population
USA
26.3
West Germany
11.1
Britain
2.1
Japan
3.3
Instance
of Theft
Country
Cases
per 100,000 population
USA
3,274.2
West Germany
3,0881.1
Britain
2,483.0
Japan
927.0
More interesting is the way the criminologists attribute reasons of spurt in
crimes and suggest measures to check the rate. A study of recent crime report
from France will reveal the approach the Westerners now adopt to tackle the grim
situation, prevailing in western countries.
A ten member committee headed by the Minister of Justice, M. Alain Peyreffite
indicated that according to 80% of the French people the violence has been
mounting. The committee came out with more disturbing statistics. Between 1967
and 1976 armed robberies against other institutions (called hold-ups) increased
twenty fold. The murder rate in France remained below one per cent per 100,000
inhabitants compared with approximately 10 in one hundred thousand in the United
States.
The report attributes the growth of criminal acts to urbanisation. It says 60%
of violent crimes occur in Paris and five other large urban centres and calls
for a return to smaller, more cohesive communities. The conclusion is reached
that cities must not be allowed to surpass a population of 200,000 if they have
yet not attained it. The committee says, it had formed a link between rising
crimes and the height of apartment buildings and notes that housing projects
with 1,000 units of six storey have one third fewer criminal incidents than a
1,000 unit project that was higher than six stories. The report also contends
that the long distance between homes and places of employment foments a sense of
alienation that contributes to crimes.
Punishment and Legal Penalties:
Legal penalties are specified in the Qur’anic Text for: (a) Murder, (b) Theft,
(c) Adultery, (d) Cluminous accusation of adultery, and (e) Offence against
public security. No apology is needed for death being the Islamic penalty for
premeditated murder, its very severity makes the punishment a deterrent,
especially if one considers how simple and expeditious judicial machinery is in
Islam and how rapid the procedure and beneficial its effects for social
tranquillity and the protection of human lives.
Theft, except for the doubtful cases, for example stealing prompted by
starvation, its punishment is amputation of the hand. Stealing is too frequently
perpetrated by force and often entails murder of the victim. One wonders
whether, in such case is it is better to have more pity on the hand of the thief
than on the life of the victim.
Punishment for Adultery:
The penalty for adultery for a married person is stoning to death, (to be
witnessed by a crowd of people) but there are very strict injunctions regarding
the proof. The offence must be testified to by four witnesses of unimpeachable
veracity. And, if a person levels a charge of adultery against someone and is
unable to bring four such witnesses, he is liable to be punished with, eighty
strokes of the whip. By enjoining such punishment, Islam has prevented
dislocation of the family, and confusion with regard to paternity. More
important it establishes the basis for a peaceful life in human society. Peace
at this price is not at all costly compared to modern measures introduced and
expenses incurred for a peaceful life but it is no where to be found because the
murderers, the thieves, the fornicators and others get away too easily. They are
a constant source of fear and disturbance because of the potential threat to
life and property. The Shariah provision nips the evil in the bud with a firm
hand and puts down its foot strongly to stop mischief and to ensure peace to the
society. Islamic punishments are, therefore, the most suited to bring about
peace and peaceful conditions. Islam deals with the culprit rather heavily in
the interest of his would-be victims.
Islamherald.comCopyright (C) 2004. All rights reserved.