"Say We believe in God and what is revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and I`saac and Jacob and the Tribes, and what was entrusted to Moses and Jesus and the prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them and to Him we have surrendered."
(Quran 3: 84)
Annemarie Schimmel in
"Islam: An Introduction" Slavery was not abolished by the
Koran, but believers are constantly admonished to treat their slaves well. In
case of illness a slave has to be looked after and well cared for. To manumit
[free] a slave is highly meritorious; the slave can ransom himself by paying
some of the money he has earned while conducting his own business. Only children
of slaves or non-Muslim prisoners of war can become slaves, never a freeborn
Muslim; therefore slavery is theoretically doomed to disappear with the
expansion of Islam. The entire history of Islam proves that slaves could occupy
any office, and many former military slaves, usually recruited from among the
Central Asian Turks, became military leaders and often even rulers as in eastern
Iran, India (the Slave Dynasty of Delhi), and medieval Egypt (the Mamluks).
Eunuchs too served in important capacities, not only as the guardians of the
women's quarters, but also in high administrative and military positions. --
p. 67
Roger Du Pasquier in
"Unveiling Islam" To answer this question, it should first
be remarked that Islam has tolerated slavery but has never approved of it, and
that all its teachings and prescriptions in this regard lead to its alleviation
as far as possible in the short term, and, in the longer term, conduce to its
progressive suppression. To abolish it would have been impossible in a world in
which it was generally practiced by all the states which bordered on the new
Muslim empire, and in which the idea of challenging the principle itself had not
occurred to anyone. It was the custom to enslave prisoners of war -- when these
were not simply massacred -- and the Islamic state would have put itself at a
grave disadvantage vis-a-vis its enemies had it not reciprocated to some extent.
By guaranteeing them humane treatment, and various possibilities of subsequently
releasing themselves, it ensured that a good number of combatants in the
opposing armies preferred captivity at the hands of Muslims to death on the
field of battle.
It should be very clearly underlined that the
slavery once practiced in the Muslim world cannot be compared to the form it had
assumed -- for instance -- in the Roman Empire. Islamic legislation subjected
slaveowners to a set of precise obligations, first among which was the slave's
right to life, for, according to a hadith, 'Whoever
kills his slave shall be killed by us'. In consequence, the murder of
a slave was punished like that of a free man.
There are many other hadiths which define
Islam's true attitude in this regard. The Prophet said: 'Your
slaves are your brethren; therefore whoever has a brother who depends upon him
must feed and clothe him in the way he feeds and clothes himself; and should not
impose upon him tasks which exceed his capacity; should you ask them to do such
things, then you are obliged to help them.' The Sharia takes this
injunction, among many others, into account when defining the responsibilities
and duties of slaveholders.
There is another teaching which enjoins
respect for the human dignity of slaves: 'Let none of
you say, "This man, or this woman, is my slave". He must
rather say: "This is my man, and this my
woman."' Putting into relief the provisional character of social
ties and the authority exercised by slaveowners over their slaves, the Prophet
said: 'It is true that God has made you their masters,
but, had He so wished, He could equally well have made you their slaves.'
To manumit a slave has always been regarded as
one of the most meritorious of all acts, and many passages of the Qur'an
recommend or even require it, particularly as a means of expiation for serious
faults. Traditional legislation lays down the methods of voluntary liberation of
slaves by their masters (itq), and there were very many Muslims who observed
these, especially at the end of their lives, so as not to die and appear before
God without having given full freedom to the human beings placed in their power
during their earthly lives.
Additionally, slaves had the ability to
enfranchise themselves at their own initiative, without waiting passively for
the goodwill of their masters: the procedure known as mukataba allowed
them to buy their own freedom with sums which they saved from their work, and
which the state frequently augmented with advances -- a measure which the
slaveowner had no right to oppose. In contrast to the situation under Roman law,
slaves were not deprived of the legal ability to exercise their rights and to
appeal to a judge against their masters in all cases of illegal treatment.
Besides domestic slavery, which was generally
imbued with a patriarchal character, there also existed a form of military
slavery, which was frequently employed by princes in need of recruits,
especially for their personal guards. This situation had the effect of
conferring an often considerable influence and power on men of servile condition
or origin, and some of these became the founders of great and illustrious
dynasties such as the Tulunids and Mamlukes of Egypt.
The object of a prosperous commercial sector,
which under the Abbasid Empire was often the speciality of non-Muslims,
particularly Byzantine and Venetian Christians, and Jews, slavery gradually
declined in importance until, at the beginning of the present century, it was
confined to a few survivals which have now disappeared entirely. Thanks to the
strict traditional controls which have always regulated the practice, it would
be difficult to deny that social conditions were remarkably humane during the
great periods of Muslim civilization, and that these, moreover, were in
conformity with the 'egalitarian' spirit of Islam, which, in a hadith, teaches that 'the blackest of Abyssinians' is superior to most noble of
Quraishites, if he has more faith. -- p. 104 to 107